↓ Skip to main content

HDL/ApoA-1 infusion and ApoA-1 gene therapy in atherosclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HDL/ApoA-1 infusion and ApoA-1 gene therapy in atherosclerosis
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, September 2015
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2015.00187
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kuang-Yuh Chyu, Prediman K. Shah

Abstract

The HDL hypothesis stating that simply raising HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) may produce cardiovascular benefits has been questioned recently based on several randomized clinical trials using CETP inhibitors or niacin to raise HDL-C levels. However, extensive pre-clinical data support the vascular protective effects of administration of exogenous ApoA-1 containing preβ-HDL like particles. Several small proof-of-concept clinical trials using such HDL/ApoA-1 infusion therapy have shown encouraging results but definitive proof of efficacy must await large scale clinical trials. In addition to HDL infusion therapy an alternative way to exploit beneficial cardiovascular effects of HDL/ApoA-1 is to use gene transfer. Preclinical studies have shown evidence of benefit using this approach; however clinical validation is yet lacking. This review summarizes our current knowledge of the aforementioned strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Other 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 13%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 13 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2015.
All research outputs
#20,290,425
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#10,057
of 16,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,166
of 266,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#59
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,065 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.