↓ Skip to main content

Immuno-Positron Emission Tomography with Zirconium-89-Labeled Monoclonal Antibodies in Oncology: What Can We Learn from Initial Clinical Trials?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immuno-Positron Emission Tomography with Zirconium-89-Labeled Monoclonal Antibodies in Oncology: What Can We Learn from Initial Clinical Trials?
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, May 2016
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2016.00131
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne W. S. Jauw, C. Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, Otto S. Hoekstra, N. Harry Hendrikse, Danielle J. Vugts, Josée M. Zijlstra, Marc C. Huisman, Guus A. M. S. van Dongen

Abstract

Selection of the right drug for the right patient is a promising approach to increase clinical benefit of targeted therapy with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Assessment of in vivo biodistribution and tumor targeting of mAbs to predict toxicity and efficacy is expected to guide individualized treatment and drug development. Molecular imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) using zirconium-89 ((89)Zr)-labeled monoclonal antibodies also known as (89)Zr-immuno-PET, visualizes and quantifies uptake of radiolabeled mAbs. This technique provides a potential imaging biomarker to assess target expression, as well as tumor targeting of mAbs. In this review we summarize results from initial clinical trials with (89)Zr-immuno-PET in oncology and discuss technical aspects of trial design. In clinical trials with (89)Zr-immuno-PET two requirements should be met for each (89)Zr-labeled mAb to realize its full potential. One requirement is that the biodistribution of the (89)Zr-labeled mAb (imaging dose) reflects the biodistribution of the drug during treatment (therapeutic dose). Another requirement is that tumor uptake of (89)Zr-mAb on PET is primarily driven by specific, antigen-mediated, tumor targeting. Initial trials have contributed toward the development of (89)Zr-immuno-PET as an imaging biomarker by showing correlation between uptake of (89)Zr-labeled mAbs on PET and target expression levels in biopsies. These results indicate that (89)Zr-immuno-PET reflects specific, antigen-mediated binding. (89)Zr-immuno-PET was shown to predict toxicity of RIT, but thus far results indicating that toxicity of mAbs or mAb-drug conjugate treatment can be predicted are lacking. So far, one study has shown that molecular imaging combined with early response assessment is able to predict response to treatment with the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab-emtansine, in patients with human epithelial growth factor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Future studies would benefit from a standardized criterion to define positive tumor uptake, possibly supported by quantitative analysis, and validated by linking imaging data with corresponding clinical outcome. Taken together, these results encourage further studies to develop (89)Zr-immuno-PET as a predictive imaging biomarker to guide individualized treatment, as well as for potential application in drug development.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 192 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Other 15 8%
Student > Master 15 8%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 47 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 21%
Chemistry 30 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 51 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,832,018
of 26,473,472 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#1,896
of 20,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,472
of 351,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#14
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,473,472 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.