↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Cannabis, Cannabinoids, and Endocannabinoids in the Lungs

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
16 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of Cannabis, Cannabinoids, and Endocannabinoids in the Lungs
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, September 2016
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2016.00317
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline Turcotte, Marie-Renée Blanchet, Michel Laviolette, Nicolas Flamand

Abstract

Since the identification of cannabinoid receptors in the 1990s, a research field has been dedicated to exploring the role of the cannabinoid system in immunity and the inflammatory response in human tissues and animal models. Although the cannabinoid system is present and crucial in many human tissues, studying the impact of cannabinoids on the lungs is particularly relevant because of their contact with exogenous cannabinoids in the context of marijuana consumption. In the past two decades, the scientific community has gathered a large body of evidence supporting that the activation of the cannabinoid system alleviates pain and reduces inflammation. In the context of lung inflammation, exogenous and endogenous cannabinoids have shown therapeutic potential because of their inhibitory effects on immune cell recruitment and functions. On the other hand, cannabinoids were shown to be deleterious to lung function and to impact respiratory pathogen clearance. In this review, we present the existing data on the regulation of lung immunity and inflammation by phytocannabinoids, synthetic cannabinoids and endocannabinoids.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 137 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Master 12 9%
Other 11 8%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 37 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 9%
Chemistry 8 6%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 32 23%
Unknown 41 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,434,592
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#489
of 16,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,295
of 321,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#10
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.