↓ Skip to main content

Development in Assay Methods for in Vitro Antimalarial Drug Efficacy Testing: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development in Assay Methods for in Vitro Antimalarial Drug Efficacy Testing: A Systematic Review
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, October 2017
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2017.00754
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shweta Sinha, Phulen Sarma, Rakesh Sehgal, Bikash Medhi

Abstract

The emergence and spread of drug resistance are the major challenges in malaria eradication mission. Besides various strategies laid down by World Health Organization, such as vector management, source reduction, early case detection, prompt treatment, and development of new diagnostics and vaccines, nevertheless the need for new and efficacious drugs against malaria has become a critical priority on the global malaria research agenda. At several screening stages, millions of compounds are screened (1,000-2,000,000 compounds per screening campaign), before pre-clinical trials to select optimum lead. Carrying out in vitro screening of antimalarials is very difficult as different assay methods are subject to numerous sources of variability across different laboratories around the globe. Despite this, in vitro screening is an essential part of antimalarial drug development as it enables to resource various confounding factors such as host immune response and drug-drug interaction. Therefore, in this article, we try to illustrate the basic necessity behind in vitro study and how new methods are developed and subsequently adopted for high-throughput antimalarial drug screening and its application in achieving the next level of in vitro screening based on the current approaches (such as stem cells).

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 187 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 16%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Lecturer 12 6%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 63 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 35 19%
Chemistry 19 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 7%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 71 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2019.
All research outputs
#12,862,254
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#3,499
of 16,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,449
of 327,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#60
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,313 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.