↓ Skip to main content

The Sources of Chemical Contaminants in Food and Their Health Implications

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
241 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
717 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Sources of Chemical Contaminants in Food and Their Health Implications
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, November 2017
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2017.00830
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irfan A. Rather, Wee Yin Koh, Woon K. Paek, Jeongheui Lim

Abstract

Food contamination is a matter of serious concern, as the high concentration of chemicals present in the edibles poses serious health risks. Protecting the public from the degrees of the harmfulness of contaminated foods has become a daunting task. This article highlights the causes, types, and health implications of chemical contamination in food. The food contamination could be due to naturally occurring contaminants in the environment or artificially introduced by the human. The phases of food processing, packaging, transportation, and storage are also significant contributors to food contamination. The implications of these chemical contaminants on human health are grave, ranging from mild gastroenteritis to fatal cases of hepatic, renal, and neurological syndromes. Although, the government regulates such chemicals in the eatables by prescribing minimum limits that are safe for human consumption yet measures still need to be taken to curb food contamination entirely. Therefore, a variety of food needs to be inspected and measured for the presence of chemical contaminants. The preventative measures pertaining about the food contaminants problems are pointed out and discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 717 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 717 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 104 15%
Student > Master 78 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 9%
Researcher 36 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 4%
Other 84 12%
Unknown 327 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 10%
Chemistry 51 7%
Environmental Science 33 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 4%
Engineering 30 4%
Other 125 17%
Unknown 375 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,328,384
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#500
of 20,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,577
of 441,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#6
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.