↓ Skip to main content

Traditional and Current Food Use of Wild Plants Listed in the Russian Pharmacopoeia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Traditional and Current Food Use of Wild Plants Listed in the Russian Pharmacopoeia
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, November 2017
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2017.00841
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander N. Shikov, Andrey N. Tsitsilin, Olga N. Pozharitskaya, Valery G. Makarov, Michael Heinrich

Abstract

Historically Russia can be regarded as a "herbophilious" society. For centuries the multinational population of Russia has used plants in daily diet and for self-medication. The specificity of dietary uptake of medicinal plants (especially those in the unique and highly developed Russian herbal medical tradition) has remained mostly unknown in other regions. Based on 11th edition of the State Pharmacopoeia of the USSR, we selected 70 wild plant species which have been used in food by local Russian populations. Empirical searches were conducted via the Russian-wide applied online database E-library.ru, library catalogs of public libraries in St-Petersburg, the databases Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and search engine Google Scholar. The large majority of species included in Russian Pharmacopoeia are used as food by local population, however, aerial parts are more widely used for food. In this review, we summarize data on medicinal species published in Russia and other countries that are included in the Russian Pharmacopoeia and have being used in food for a long time. Consequently, the Russian Pharmacopoeia is an important source of information on plant species used traditionally at the interface of food and medicine. At the same time, there are the so-called "functional foods", which denotes foods that not only serves to provide nutrition but also can be a source for prevention and cure of various diseases. This review highlights the potential of wild species of Russia monographed in its pharmacopeia for further developing new functional foods and-through the lens of their incorporation into the pharmacopeia-showcases the species' importance in Russia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Professor 6 5%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 33 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 44 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,496,635
of 26,189,645 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#3,370
of 20,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,505
of 450,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#42
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,189,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.