↓ Skip to main content

Biology of Platelet Purinergic Receptors and Implications for Platelet Heterogeneity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biology of Platelet Purinergic Receptors and Implications for Platelet Heterogeneity
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2018.00037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Milka Koupenova, Katya Ravid

Abstract

Platelets are small anucleated cells present only in mammals. Platelets mediate intravascular hemostatic balance, prevent interstitial bleeding, and have a major role in thrombosis. Activation of platelet purinergic receptors is instrumental in initiation of hemostasis and formation of the hemostatic plug, although this activation process becomes problematic in pathological settings of thrombosis. This review briefly outlines the roles and function of currently known platelet purinergic receptors (P1 and P2) in the setting of hemostasis and thrombosis. Additionally, we discuss recent novel studies on purinergic receptor distribution according to heterogeneous platelet size, and the possible implication of this distribution on hemostatic function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 15 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 19 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2021.
All research outputs
#14,965,143
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#5,297
of 16,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,708
of 440,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#102
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,331 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.