↓ Skip to main content

Jab1/COPS5 as a Novel Biomarker for Diagnosis, Prognosis, Therapy Prediction and Therapeutic Tools for Human Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Jab1/COPS5 as a Novel Biomarker for Diagnosis, Prognosis, Therapy Prediction and Therapeutic Tools for Human Cancer
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2018.00135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guohong Liu, Francois X. Claret, Fuling Zhou, Yunbao Pan

Abstract

C-Jun activation domain-binding protein-1 (Jab1) involves in controlling cellular proliferation, cell cycle, apoptosis, affecting a series of pathways, as well as regulating genomic instability and DNA damage response (DDR). Jab1/COPS5 dysregulation contributes to oncogenesis by deactivating several tumor suppressors and activating oncogenes. Jab1 overexpression was found in many tumor types, illuminating its important role in cancer initiation, progression, and prognosis. Jab1/COPS5 has spurred a strong research interest in developing inhibitors of oncogenes/oncoproteins for cancer therapy. In this paper, we present evidences demonstrating the importance of Jab1/COPS5 overexpression in several cancer types and recent advances in dissecting the Jab1/COPS5 upstream and downstream signaling pathways. By conducting ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) based on the Ingenuity Knowledge Base, we investigated signaling network that interacts with Jab1/COPS5. The data confirmed the important role of Jab1/COPS5 in tumorigenesis, demonstrating the potential of Jab1/COPS5 to be used as a biomarker for cancer patients, and further support that Jab1/COPS5 may serve as a potential therapeutic target in different cancers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 35%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,466,701
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#10,239
of 16,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,830
of 330,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#222
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,334 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.