You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Atypical Pharmacodynamic Properties and Metabolic Profile of the Abused Synthetic Cannabinoid AB-PINACA: Potential Contribution to Pronounced Adverse Effects Relative to Δ9-THC
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, September 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2018.01084 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rachel D. Hutchison, Benjamin M. Ford, Lirit N. Franks, Catheryn D. Wilson, Azure L. Yarbrough, Ryoichi Fujiwara, Mark K. Su, Denise Fernandez, Laura P. James, Jeffery H. Moran, Amy L. Patton, William E. Fantegrossi, Anna Radominska-Pandya, Paul L. Prather |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 25% |
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 22% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 16% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Researcher | 4 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 16% |
Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 20% |
Psychology | 9 | 20% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 16% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,515,581
of 24,585,148 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#5,438
of 18,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,753
of 346,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#136
of 395 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,585,148 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,607 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 395 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.