The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lack of Effects of Extended Sessions of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Over Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Craving and Relapses in Crack-Cocaine Users
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2018.01198 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jaisa Klauss, Quézia Silva Anders, Luna Vasconcelos Felippe, Leonardo Villaverde Buback Ferreira, Mateus Amorim Cruz, Michael Andreas Nitsche, Ester Miyuki Nakamura-Palacios |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,024,132
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#5,349
of 16,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,333
of 350,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#154
of 426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.