↓ Skip to main content

Cost-Utility Analysis of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Strategies for People Undergoing Elective Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement Surgeries in the English National Health Service

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
33 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-Utility Analysis of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Strategies for People Undergoing Elective Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement Surgeries in the English National Health Service
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, November 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2018.01370
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dalia M. Dawoud, David Wonderling, Jessica Glen, Sedina Lewis, Xavier L. Griffin, Beverley J. Hunt, Gerard Stansby, Michael Reed, Nigel Rossiter, Jagjot Kaur Chahal, Carlos Sharpin, Peter Barry

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 19%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Lecturer 3 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 25 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 34%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 26 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,878,972
of 25,386,384 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#753
of 19,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,918
of 445,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#22
of 388 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,386,384 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 388 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.