The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Experimental Paradigm for the Assessment of the Non-pharmacological Mechanism of Action in Medical Device Classification: The Example of Glycerine as Laxative
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2018.01410 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Claudia Sardi, Stefano Garetto, Laura Capone, Valentina Galbiati, Marco Racchi, Stefano Govoni, Emiliano Giovagnoni, Jacopo Lucci |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2019.
All research outputs
#18,003,568
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#7,282
of 16,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,469
of 436,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#175
of 363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,489 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.