↓ Skip to main content

A Simple Clinical Pre-procedure Risk Model for Predicting Thrombocytopenia Associated With Periprocedural Use of Tirofiban in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Simple Clinical Pre-procedure Risk Model for Predicting Thrombocytopenia Associated With Periprocedural Use of Tirofiban in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, December 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2018.01456
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi-Hu Yi, Wen-Jun Yin, Zhi-Chun Gu, Wei-Jin Fang, Dai-Yang Li, Can Hu, Kun Liu, Rong-Rong Ma, Ling-Yun Zhou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 25%
Unspecified 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Psychology 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,334,214
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#3,137
of 16,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,027
of 436,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#96
of 368 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,489 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 368 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.