↓ Skip to main content

The Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed Combination of Chinese Herbal Medicine in Chronic Urticaria: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed Combination of Chinese Herbal Medicine in Chronic Urticaria: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, December 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2018.01474
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sien-Hung Yang, Yi-Hsuan Lin, Jr-Rung Lin, Hsing-Yu Chen, Sindy Hu, Yi-Han Yang, Yi-Hsun Yang, Yin-Shuo Yang, Yao-Fan Fang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Lecturer 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 14 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 15 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#20,484,109
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,580
of 20,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#328,551
of 449,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#191
of 358 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 358 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.