The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An in vitro ADME and in vivo Pharmacokinetic Study of Novel TB-Active Decoquinate Derivatives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2019.00120 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lloyd Tanner, Richard K. Haynes, Lubbe Wiesner |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2019.
All research outputs
#18,009,288
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#7,284
of 16,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,572
of 352,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#242
of 362 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 362 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.