↓ Skip to main content

Evodiamine Augments NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation and Anti-bacterial Responses Through Inducing α-Tubulin Acetylation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evodiamine Augments NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation and Anti-bacterial Responses Through Inducing α-Tubulin Acetylation
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2019.00290
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chen-Guang Li, Qiong-Zhen Zeng, Ming-Ye Chen, Li-Hui Xu, Cheng-Cheng Zhang, Feng-Yi Mai, Chen-Ying Zeng, Xian-Hui He, Dong-Yun Ouyang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 10 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2019.
All research outputs
#14,334,369
of 24,083,187 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#4,561
of 17,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,877
of 355,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#179
of 342 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,083,187 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 342 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.