↓ Skip to main content

Appraisal of Non-Cardiovascular Safety for Sodium–Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trials

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Appraisal of Non-Cardiovascular Safety for Sodium–Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trials
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, September 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2019.01066
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fang-Hong Shi, Hao Li, Long Shen, Zhen Zhang, Yi-Hong Jiang, Yao-Min Hu, Xiao-Yan Liu, Zhi-Chun Gu, Jing Ma, Hou-Wen Lin

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Other 2 5%
Lecturer 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 17 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 16 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2019.
All research outputs
#13,077,446
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#3,659
of 16,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,538
of 343,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#173
of 400 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 400 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.