↓ Skip to main content

Impacts of Clinical Pharmacist Intervention on the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impacts of Clinical Pharmacist Intervention on the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, October 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2019.01112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huimin Xu, Jie Zou, Xiaoli Ye, Jiayun Han, Lan Gao, Shunbin Luo, Jingling Wang, Chunyan Huang, Xiaofeng Yan, Haibin Dai

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 31 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 34 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2019.
All research outputs
#12,944,128
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#3,553
of 16,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,629
of 352,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#169
of 429 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 429 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.