You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Importance of Quality Assessment in Clinical Research in Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2019.01228 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rieko Ueda, Yuji Nishizaki, Yasuhiro Homma, Shoji Sanada, Toshiaki Otsuka, Shinji Yasuno, Kotone Matsuyama, Naotake Yanagisawa, Masashi Nagao, Kazutoshi Fujibayashi, Shuko Nojiri, Yumiko Seo, Natsumi Yamada, Patrick Devos, Hiroyuki Daida |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Librarian | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2019.
All research outputs
#20,587,621
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#10,387
of 16,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,368
of 356,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#322
of 458 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 458 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.