The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non-Exosomal and Exosomal Circulatory MicroRNAs: Which Are More Valid as Biomarkers?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2019.01500 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nik Nur Syazana Binti Nik Mohamed Kamal, Wan Nazatul Shima Shahidan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 20% |
| Iraq | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 204 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 67 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 54 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 79 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2020.
All research outputs
#15,837,686
of 26,371,446 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#5,325
of 20,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,780
of 485,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#157
of 431 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,371,446 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 485,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 431 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.