The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Small Leucine-Rich Proteoglycans in Skin Wound Healing
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2019.01649 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiaoxiao Pang, Nuo Dong, Zhong Zheng |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 27 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 14% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 29 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,367,061
of 25,002,811 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#4,015
of 19,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,234
of 464,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#136
of 448 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,002,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 448 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.