The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Use of Peripheral Blood-Derived Stem Cells for Cartilage Repair and Regeneration In Vivo: A Review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2020.00404 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
You-Rong Chen, Xin Yan, Fu-Zhen Yuan, Jing Ye, Bing-Bing Xu, Zhu-Xing Zhou, Zi-Mu Mao, Jian Guan, Yi-Fan Song, Ze-Wen Sun, Xin-Jie Wang, Ze-Yi Chen, Ding-Yu Wang, Bao-Shi Fan, Meng Yang, Shi-Tang Song, Dong Jiang, Jia-Kuo Yu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 20% |
Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 12% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 16% |
Unknown | 18 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2020.
All research outputs
#18,718,509
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,520
of 16,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,821
of 371,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#302
of 528 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 528 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.