The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic Review and Pharmacological Considerations for Chloroquine and Its Analogs in the Treatment for COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2020.554172 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hongwei Peng, Zhangren Chen, Yunyun Wang, Simei Ren, Tiantian Xu, Xin Lai, Jinhua Wen, Mengjun Zhao, Chuanfei Zeng, Lijuan Du, Yanmei Zhang, Li Cao, Jinfang Hu, Xiaohua Wei, Tao Hong |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Librarian | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 20% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2021.
All research outputs
#14,525,076
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#4,867
of 16,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,614
of 420,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#144
of 467 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 467 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.