The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacoepidemiology: A Systematic Review. Part 2–Comparison of the Performance of Artificial Intelligence and Traditional Pharmacoepidemiological Techniques
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2020.568659 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maurizio Sessa, David Liang, Abdul Rauf Khan, Murat Kulahci, Morten Andersen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
Researcher | 5 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Lecturer | 4 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 25 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 17% |
Unknown | 25 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2021.
All research outputs
#15,665,271
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#6,694
of 16,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,400
of 506,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#261
of 588 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 588 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.