The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integrated Random Negative Sampling and Uncertainty Sampling in Active Learning Improve Clinical Drug Safety Drug–Drug Interaction Information Retrieval
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2020.582470 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Weixin Xie, Limei Wang, Qi Cheng, Xueying Wang, Ying Wang, Hongyuan Bi, Bo He, Weixing Feng |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 2 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,895,945
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#2,378
of 16,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,423
of 434,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#133
of 865 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 865 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.