↓ Skip to main content

Iacta Alea Est: The Inexorable Advance of Tofacitinib in the Treatment of Dermatomyositis-Associated Rapidly Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease. A Case Report

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Iacta Alea Est: The Inexorable Advance of Tofacitinib in the Treatment of Dermatomyositis-Associated Rapidly Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease. A Case Report
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, December 2020
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2020.585761
Pubmed ID
Authors

Walter Conca, Ihab Weheba, Mohei-Eldin Abouzied, Abeer Abdelsayed, Yousif Aleyouni, Eid Al‐Mutairy, Nasir Bakshi, Mohammad Khalid

Abstract

Rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease is typically associated with clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis and the anti-melanoma differentiation associated gene 5 antibody, a condition with high mortality and resistance to classic immunosuppression. Recent reports have described the efficacy of the Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib in the treatment of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease in anti-melanoma differentiation associated gene 5 antibody-positive clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis. It is uncertain, however, whether tofacitinib alters the course of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease in other variants of dermatomyositis that are unrelated to the anti-melanoma differentiation associated gene 5 antibody and whether the early addition of the anti-fibrotic tyrosine kinase inhibitor nintedanib interferes with the development of fibrosis. To answer these questions, we present and discuss the case of an elderly woman who presented with a flare of dermatomyositis sine myositis. Based upon the detection of anti-Jo-1 antibodies and the absence of anti-melanoma differentiation associated gene 5 antibodies, anti-synthetase syndrome was diagnosed. While the cutaneous manifestations quickly resolved with prednisone, azathioprine and tacrolimus, the respiratory function paradoxically and rapidly deteriorated, and invoked the use of tofacitinib. Markedly raised ferritin levels and a severe numerical deficiency of circulating natural killer cells paralleled the acute lung inflammation, which was reflected by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose hypermetabolism on positron emission tomography/CT. Tofacitinib lead to a prompt clinical recovery, with a reduction in oxygen requirement, correction of hyperferritinemia, reversal of the natural killer cell deficiency, and a decrease in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the affected lung segments. Subsequently, nintedanib was added at a point in time when inflammation subsided. Apart from cytomegalovirus reactivation no adverse events occurred. In conclusion, tofacitinib reversed the pronounced inflammatory component of anti-Jo-1 antibody-positive, anti-melanoma differentiation associated gene 5 antibody-negative rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease, confirming that Janus kinase signaling pathways are critically involved in the pathogenesis of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease, apparently independently of the targeted autoantigen. Although some improvement in pulmonary function was observed, it seems premature to conclusively judge on reversibility or prevention of pulmonary fibrosis by pairing both kinase inhibitors for which an extended follow-up and ideally, prospective and controlled studies are needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 11 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 28%
Unspecified 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Computer Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 13 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2021.
All research outputs
#18,779,356
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,559
of 16,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#377,489
of 506,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#315
of 563 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 563 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.