↓ Skip to main content

Subacute Toxicity Study of Nicotinamide Mononucleotide via Oral Administration

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Subacute Toxicity Study of Nicotinamide Mononucleotide via Oral Administration
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, December 2020
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2020.604404
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yingnan You, Yang Gao, Han Wang, Jingshu Li, Xiang Zhang, Zhengjiang Zhu, Nan Liu

Abstract

Nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN), a key precursory metabolite of NAD+, has been shown to elevate the cellular level of NAD+ and ameliorate various age-related diseases. Despite these progresses, systemic evaluation pertaining to the subacute toxicity of NMN remains to be determined. Here, we examine the subacute toxicity of NMN in mice and beagle dogs. Mice were gavaged with a saturated concentration of NMN solution at the maximum intragastric dose once or twice per day for 7 days. Dogs were gavaged twice per day for 14 days. In mice, NMN administrated once per day for 7 days is well tolerated with minimal deleterious effects. Upon higher dosage, we observe slightly increased level of alamine aminotransferase, while other biomarkers remain unchanged. Consistently, administration of NMN in beagle dogs only results in mild increases in creatinine and uric acid. Together, our study highlights the safety of NMN, providing a possible safe dose range for oral administration of NMN.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Other 4 15%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 12 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 13 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,218,072
of 24,620,470 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#3,870
of 18,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,294
of 516,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#149
of 565 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,620,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 565 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.