You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In silico Analyses of Immune System Protein Interactome Network, Single-Cell RNA Sequencing of Human Tissues, and Artificial Neural Networks Reveal Potential Therapeutic Targets for Drug Repurposing Against COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2021.598925 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrés López-Cortés, Patricia Guevara-Ramírez, Nikolaos C. Kyriakidis, Carlos Barba-Ostria, Ángela León Cáceres, Santiago Guerrero, Esteban Ortiz-Prado, Cristian R. Munteanu, Eduardo Tejera, Doménica Cevallos-Robalino, Ana María Gómez-Jaramillo, Katherine Simbaña-Rivera, Adriana Granizo-Martínez, Gabriela Pérez-M, Silvana Moreno, Jennyfer M. García-Cárdenas, Ana Karina Zambrano, Yunierkis Pérez-Castillo, Alejandro Cabrera-Andrade, Lourdes Puig San Andrés, Carolina Proaño-Castro, Jhommara Bautista, Andreina Quevedo, Nelson Varela, Luis Abel Quiñones, César Paz-y-Miño |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 38 | 44% |
| Comoros | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Austria | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Panama | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 29 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 77 | 89% |
| Scientists | 8 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 16% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2022.
All research outputs
#693,822
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#253
of 19,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,975
of 452,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#10
of 642 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 642 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.