The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Traditional Uses, Phytochemistry, Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Clinical Uses of Metagentiana Rhodantha (Franch.) T.N.Ho and S.W.Liu, an Ethnomedicine in Southwest China
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, April 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2021.658628 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Botao Chang, Songjiang Tang, Rong Chen, Nan Xiao, Jingsong Zhu, Mengxian Tian, Huizhong Jiang, Xi Li, Zhonglu Jian, Xu Han, Ying Gao, Qi Yao |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 12% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 12% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2021.
All research outputs
#15,685,238
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#6,721
of 16,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,957
of 436,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#371
of 884 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 884 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.