↓ Skip to main content

The Role and Mechanism of Histone Deacetylases in Acute Kidney Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role and Mechanism of Histone Deacetylases in Acute Kidney Injury
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, June 2021
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2021.695237
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xun Zhou, Hui Chen, Yingfeng Shi, Xiaoyan Ma, Shougang Zhuang, Na Liu

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common clinical complication with an incidence of up to 8-18% in hospitalized patients. AKI is also a complication of COVID-19 patients and is associated with an increased risk of death. In recent years, numerous studies have suggested that epigenetic regulation is critically involved in the pathophysiological process and prognosis of AKI. Histone acetylation, one of the epigenetic regulations, is negatively regulated by histone deacetylases (HDACs). Increasing evidence indicates that HDACs play an important role in the pathophysiological development of AKI by regulation of apoptosis, inflammation, oxidative stress, fibrosis, cell survival, autophagy, ATP production, and mitochondrial biogenesis (MB). In this review, we summarize and discuss the role and mechanism of HDACs in the pathogenesis of AKI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,037,067
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#3,608
of 20,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,726
of 449,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#155
of 940 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 940 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.