The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
External evaluation of published population pharmacokinetic models of posaconazole
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2022.1005348 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shuqi Huang, Qin Ding, Nan Yang, Zexu Sun, Qian Cheng, Wei Liu, Yejun Li, Xin Chen, Cuifang Wu, Qi Pei |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2023.
All research outputs
#16,670,334
of 24,527,525 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#7,303
of 18,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,263
of 429,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#483
of 1,520 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,527,525 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,520 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.