The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rodent Lethality Models Are Problematic for Evaluating Antivenoms for Human Envenoming
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2022.830384 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anjana Silva, Wayne C. Hodgson, Theo Tasoulis, Geoffrey K. Isbister |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#14,435,674
of 24,631,014 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#4,424
of 18,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,685
of 512,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#248
of 1,228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,631,014 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 512,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.