↓ Skip to main content

A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Emergency Management of Anaphylaxis (2020)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Emergency Management of Anaphylaxis (2020)
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2022.845689
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaotong Li, Qingbian Ma, Jia Yin, Ya’an Zheng, Rongchang Chen, Yuguo Chen, Tianzuo Li, Yuqin Wang, Kehu Yang, Hongjun Zhang, Yida Tang, Yaolong Chen, Hailong Dong, Qinglong Gu, Daihong Guo, Xuehui Hu, Lixin Xie, Baohua Li, Yuzhen Li, Tongyu Lin, Fang Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Lanting Lyu, Quanxi Mei, Jie Shao, Huawen Xin, Fan Yang, Hui Yang, Wanhua Yang, Xu Yao, Chunshui Yu, Siyan Zhan, Guoqiang Zhang, Minggui Wang, Zhu Zhu, Baoguo Zhou, Jianqing Gu, Mo Xian, Yuan Lyu, Zhengqian Li, Hangci Zheng, Chang Cui, Shuhua Deng, Chao Huang, Lisha Li, Pengfei Liu, Peng Men, Chunli Shao, Sai Wang, Xiang Ma, Qiang Wang, Suodi Zhai, Qingbian Ma, Jia Yin, Ya’an Zheng, Rongchang Chen, Yuguo Chen, Tianzuo Li, Yuqin Wang, Hongjun Zhang, Hailong Dong, Baohua Li, Fang Liu, Jie Shao, Zhu Zhu, Jianqing Gu, Mo Xian, Yuan Lyu, Lisha Li, Suodi Zhai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 27 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 30 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,177,213
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#1,365
of 16,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,545
of 436,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#66
of 1,240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,009 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.