↓ Skip to main content

Novel 1,2,3-Triazole Erlotinib Derivatives as Potent IDO1 Inhibitors: Design, Drug-Target Interactions Prediction, Synthesis, Biological Evaluation, Molecular Docking and ADME Properties Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel 1,2,3-Triazole Erlotinib Derivatives as Potent IDO1 Inhibitors: Design, Drug-Target Interactions Prediction, Synthesis, Biological Evaluation, Molecular Docking and ADME Properties Studies
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, May 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2022.854965
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gui-Qing Xu, Xiao-Qing Gong, Ying-Ying Zhu, Xiao-Jun Yao, Li-Zeng Peng, Ge Sun, Jian-Xue Yang, Long-Fei Mao

Abstract

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) plays a predominant role in cancer immunotherapy which catalyzes the initial and rate limiting steps of the kynurenine pathway as a key enzyme. To explore novel IDO1 inhibitors, five derivatives of erlotinib-linked 1,2,3-triazole compounds were designed by using a structure-based drug design strategy. Drug-target interactions (DTI) were predicted by DeePurpose, an easy-to-use deep learning library that contains more than 50 algorithms. The DTI prediction results suggested that the designed molecules have potential inhibitory activities for IDO1. Chemical syntheses and bioassays showed that the compounds exhibited remarkable inhibitory activities against IDO1, among them, compound e was the most potent with an IC50 value of 0.32 ± 0.07 μM in the Hela cell assay. The docking model and ADME analysis exhibited that the effective interactions of these compounds with heme iron and better drug-likeness ensured the IDO1 inhibitory activities. The studies suggested that compound e was a novel and interesting IDO1 inhibitor for further development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%
Computer Science 1 14%
Chemistry 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2024.
All research outputs
#18,158,809
of 26,565,554 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,105
of 20,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,003
of 450,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#453
of 1,242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,565,554 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.