↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Total flavonoids of Rhizoma Drynariae ameliorate bone growth in experimentally induced tibial dyschondroplasia in chickens via regulation of OPG/RANKL axis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Total flavonoids of Rhizoma Drynariae ameliorate bone growth in experimentally induced tibial dyschondroplasia in chickens via regulation of OPG/RANKL axis
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, August 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2022.969027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tingting Xu, Jingjing Zheng, WeiXing Jin, Lu Li, Luxi Lin, Aftab Shaukat, Chaodong Zhang, Qinqin Cao, Muhammad Ashraf, Shucheng Huang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2022.
All research outputs
#21,834,295
of 24,363,506 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#11,695
of 18,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#353,211
of 420,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#793
of 1,365 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,363,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,365 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.