The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Apatinib for recurrent/progressive glioblastoma multiforme: A salvage option
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, August 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2022.969565 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hong-Hong Zhang, Xiao-Jing Du, Mei-Ling Deng, Lie Zheng, Dun-Chen Yao, Zhi-Qiang Wang, Qun-Ying Yang, Shao-Xiong Wu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,299,310
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#1,907
of 16,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,552
of 435,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#80
of 1,391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.