The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Editorial: Venoms, animal and microbial toxins, volume II
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2022.973628 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhijian Cao, Delavar Shahbazzadeh, Hervé Kovacic, Patrick Michael McNutt, Jing-Lin Wang, Heike Wulff, Yuri Utkin, Jean-Marc Sabatier |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 18% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,678,179
of 26,200,644 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#2,763
of 20,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,124
of 437,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#136
of 1,405 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,200,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,405 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.