The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Diagnostic yield and variant reassessment in the genes encoding Nav1.5 channel in Russian patients with Brugada syndrome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, August 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2022.984299 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elena Zaklyazminskaya, Anna Shestak, Dmitry Podolyak, Vera Komoliatova, Leonid Makarov, Anna Novitskaya, Amiran Revishvili |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2022.
All research outputs
#18,825,900
of 23,330,477 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,620
of 16,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,700
of 433,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#611
of 1,418 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,330,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,418 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.