The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A focus on CKD reporting and inappropriate prescribing among older patients discharged from geriatric and nephrology units throughout Italy: A nationwide multicenter retrospective cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2022.996042 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Filippo Aucella, Andrea Corsonello, Luca Soraci, Paolo Fabbietti, Michele Antonio Prencipe, Giuseppe Gatta, Fabrizia Lattanzio, Livio Cortese, Maria Rosaria Pagnotta, Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi, Filippo Aucella, Roberta Benevento, Gianfranca Cabiddu, Leonardo Calandra, Marco Colucci, Giuseppe Coppolino, Filippo De Stefano, Ciro Esposito, Vittoria Esposito, Giorgio Fuiano, Giuseppe Gatta, Rachele Grifa, Marco Guarneri, Daniela Leonardis, Francesca Mallamaci, Elena Mancini, Marcora Mandreoli, Katia Montalbano, Alessandra Perna, Michele Prencipe, Francesca Romani, Carolina Ruosi, Laura Scichilone, Giuseppe Sileno, Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi, Giuseppe Armentaro, Mario Barbagallo, Giuseppe Bellelli, Mario Bo, Salvatore Bonanzinga, Ramona Caloiero, Alessandro Cavarape, Francesco Corica, Andrea Corsonello, Livio Cortese, Annalisa Cozza, Antonio Greco, Ilaria Lazzari, Maurizio Leonardo Guerrieri, Dario Leosco, Alessandra Marengoni, Fabio Monzani, Maria Rosaria Pagnotta, Angela Sciacqua, Luca Soraci, Vittoria Tibaldi, Andrea Ungar |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Researcher | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2022.
All research outputs
#15,177,072
of 23,344,526 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#5,475
of 16,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,367
of 443,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#334
of 1,466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,344,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.