The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hypericum japonicum extract inhibited porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in vitro and in vivo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2023.1112610 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hongyu Rao, Weiwei Su, Xiaoli Zhang, Yonggang Wang, Tao Li, Jinliang Li, Xuan Zeng, Peibo Li |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#16,371,232
of 25,843,331 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#5,869
of 20,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,495
of 418,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#196
of 910 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,843,331 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 910 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.