↓ Skip to main content

An updated examination of the perception of barriers for pharmacogenomics implementation and the usefulness of drug/gene pairs in Latin America and the Caribbean

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An updated examination of the perception of barriers for pharmacogenomics implementation and the usefulness of drug/gene pairs in Latin America and the Caribbean
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, May 2023
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2023.1175737
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aimeé Salas-Hernández, Macarena Galleguillos, Matías Carrasco, Andrés López-Cortés, María Ana Redal, Dora Fonseca-Mendoza, Patricia Esperón, Farith González-Martínez, Ismael Lares-Asseff, Alberto Lazarowski, Verónica Loera-Castañeda, Diadelis Remírez, Matías F. Martínez, Rodrigo Vargas, Fabricio Rios-Santos, Antonio Macho, Juan P. Cayún, Germán R. Perez, Carolina Gutierrez, Leslie C. Cerpa, Tamara Leiva, Susan Calfunao, Lesly Xajil, Christopher Sandoval, Marcelo Suárez, Ariana Gonzalez, Gabriela Echeverría-Garcés, Luis Sullón-Dextre, Eugenia Cordero-García, Alexis R. Morales, Andrea Avendaño, Enrique Sánchez, Laura C. Bastone, Cesar Lara, Patricia Zuluaga-Arias, Ana María Soler, Julio Da Luz, Gabriela Burgueño-Rodríguez, Marcelo Vital, Elizabeth Reyes-Reyes, Alexander Huaccha, Yeimy V. Ariza, Naomi Tzul, Ana L. Rendón, Roberto Serrano, Larissa Acosta, Angelo Motta-Pardo, Leonardo Beltrán-Angarita, Erika Brand, Miguel A. Jiménez, Gladys Maribel Hidalgo-Lozada, Marina M. J. Romero-Prado, Karla Escobar-Castro, Mariel Umaña-Rivas, Juan D. Vivas, Paola Lagos, Yineth Ballén Martínez, Sharleth Quesada, Camila Calfio, Maria L. Arias, María A. Lavanderos, Dante D. Cáceres, Alberto Salazar-Granara, Nelson M. Varela, Luis A. Quiñones

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Unspecified 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 1 3%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 16 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 10%
Unspecified 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Unknown 16 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,815,519
of 23,749,054 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#2,133
of 17,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,839
of 216,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#14
of 446 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,749,054 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 446 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.