The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
2023 Chinese guideline for lipid management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2023.1190934 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jian-Jun Li, Shui-Ping Zhao, Dong Zhao, Guo-Ping Lu, Dao-Quan Peng, Jing Liu, Zhen-Yue Chen, Yuan-Lin Guo, Na-Qiong Wu, Sheng-Kai Yan, Zeng-Wu Wang, Run-Lin Gao, Hong Chen, Zhenyue Chen, Xiang Cheng, Yundai Chen, Zhenyue Chen, Yugang Dong, Kefei Dou, Runlin Gao, Dongfeng Gu, Junbo Ge, Wei Gao, Yifang Guo, Yuanlin Guo, Runlin Gao, Yuanlin Guo, Ying Gao, Yong Huo, Suling Han, Dayi Hu, Weiping Jia, Linong Ji, Meilin Liu, Jianjun Li, Guoping Lu, Yong Li, Jing Li, Xiaoying Li, Guangwei Li, Yuhua Liao, Guoping Lu, Jing Liu, Jianjun Li, Chun Liang, Changsheng Ma, Yitong Ma, Liyuan Ma, Guang Ning, Daoquan Peng, Daoquan Peng, Yihong Sun, Xubo Shi, Yida Tang, Zengwu Wang, Zengwu Wang, Naqiong Wu, Yangfeng Wu, Zengwu Wang, Naqiong Wu, Chengbin Wang, Yongjun Wang, Wei Xiang, Shengkai Yan, Xiaowei Yan, Shengkai Yan, Zuyi Yuan, Bo Yu, Ping Ye, Dalong Zhu, Yun Zhang, Jiajun Zhao, Dong Zhao, Shuiping Zhao, Dajin Zou, Jian Zhang, Ruiyan Zhang, Zhou Zhou, Wenhua Zhao, Ye Zhu, Zhiming Zhu, Zhengpei Zeng, Siyan Zhan, Dong Zhao, Shuiping Zhao |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Guatemala | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Librarian | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2024.
All research outputs
#4,558,483
of 26,538,386 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#2,321
of 20,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,162
of 365,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#46
of 691 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 691 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.