The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparative efficacy of different Chinese patent medicines in preventing restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2023.1265766 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jiasai Fan, Tianli Li, Fenglan Pu, Nan Guo, Jing Wang, Yuqian Gao, Hongbing Zhao, Xian Wang, Haiyan Zhu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 1 | 33% |
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2024.
All research outputs
#17,350,784
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#6,633
of 20,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,646
of 374,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#103
of 668 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 668 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.