The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A study on the preparation conditions of lidocaine microemulsion based on multi-objective genetic algorithm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2023.1272454 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuchao Qiao, Xuchun Wang, Hao Ren, Yu Cui, Jiahui Ren, Chongqi Hao, Zhiyang Zhao, Jing Liu, Ruiqing Zhao, Yiting Li, Qingping Tian, Lixia Qiu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#19,951,550
of 24,520,935 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#9,456
of 18,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,422
of 163,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#85
of 389 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,935 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 389 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.