↓ Skip to main content

Global research trends and hot spots on autophagy and kidney diseases: a bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2022

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global research trends and hot spots on autophagy and kidney diseases: a bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2022
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, November 2023
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2023.1275792
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sinan Ai, Yake Li, Huijuan Zheng, Zhen Wang, Weijing Liu, JiaYin Tao, Yaotan Li, Yaoxian Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#22,311,739
of 24,901,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#12,035
of 19,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,538
of 168,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#116
of 374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,901,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.