The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of four major bioactive components of Cynanchum auriculatum extract: a UPLC–MS/MS study in normal and functional dyspepsia rats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2023.1279971 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jia Sun, Xin Meng, Di Huang, Zipeng Gong, Chunhua Liu, Ting Liu, Jie Pan, Yuan Lu, Lin Zheng |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#16,809,255
of 24,727,020 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#7,374
of 18,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,395
of 209,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#63
of 440 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,727,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 440 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.