The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The potential of astragalus polysaccharide for treating diabetes and its action mechanism
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2024.1339406 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shiyu Liu, Luyao Wang, Zehua Zhang, YuLin Leng, Yan Yang, Xiaoxu Fu, Hongyan Xie, Hong Gao, Chunguang Xie |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 33% |
Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#23,112,941
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#12,540
of 19,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,752
of 196,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#93
of 296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.