The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Utilization of nanotechnology and experimental design in the development and optimization of a posaconazole‒calendula oil nanoemulgel for the treatment of mouth disorders
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2024.1347551 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mohammed Alissa, Ahmed Hjazi, Ghadah S. Abusalim, Ghfren S. Aloraini, Suad A. Alghamdi, Nahed S. Alharthi, Waleed Y. Rizg, Khaled M. Hosny, Nada Binmadi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 22% |
Professor | 1 | 11% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 22% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#16,755,883
of 26,491,309 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#6,018
of 20,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,534
of 391,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#90
of 750 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,491,309 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 750 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.