↓ Skip to main content

Functional roles of circular RNAs in lung injury

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional roles of circular RNAs in lung injury
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2024.1354806
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fei-Fei Gao, Dian-Qing Chen, Yue-Tong Jiang, Cui-Fei Han, Bi-Yun Lin, Zhan Yang, Juan-Hua Quan, Ying-Huan Xiong, Xin-Tian Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#21,342,941
of 26,196,613 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#10,178
of 20,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,315
of 345,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#143
of 476 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,196,613 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 476 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.