The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessment of the current status of real-world pharmacogenomic testing: informed consent, patient education, and related practices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2024.1355412 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucas Pereira, Cyrine-Eliana Haidar, Susanne B. Haga, Anna G. Cisler, April Hall, Sanjay K. Shukla, Scott J. Hebbring, Emili J. W. Leary |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#15,143,459
of 25,335,657 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#5,035
of 19,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,194
of 162,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#23
of 351 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,335,657 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 351 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.